Problem class: governed ingestion of heterogeneous and unstructured sources, and generation of a structured professional deliverable with a defensible provenance chain.
A property-damage matter. Assembling it requires the intake questionnaire, the recorded deed, the policy, the adjuster's correspondence, prior filings, photographs with inconsistent metadata, and a production from the other side that arrived as 340 pages of scanned PDF. Nine systems. No shared schema. Nothing reconciles automatically.
An associate assembles the demand. A second associate, given the same file, produces a materially different one — different valuation basis, different emphasis, different omissions. Neither is wrong. The reasoning that would distinguish them lives in a senior partner's head and was never written down.
Then the number gets challenged — in a fee dispute, on a motion, at a bar complaint. The question is where did this figure come from, and the honest answer is that somebody typed it after reading several documents, four months ago.
Two defects, and they share a root. Provenance is not captured, so no assertion can be traced back to the document that supports it. And methodology is not encoded, so consistency depends on which person happened to do the work.
The second defect is the expensive one. The firm's genuine asset is the judgement its senior people apply consistently — and that asset currently leaves the building at 6pm and retires eventually. Encoding it is the difference between a firm that scales and a firm permanently capped by the calendar of its best lawyer.
A pre-development real estate analytics platform, built from zero. Its users were doing what your associates do: assembling a high-stakes recommendation by hand from sources that disagree, in formats that do not interoperate, under time pressure — and signing their name to the result. Regulatory text as prose, market data as JSON and CSV, boundary data as GeoJSON, reference data as static extracts. Two analysts, same property, materially different conclusions — inconsistency, not inaccuracy, was the commercial problem.



“They immediately understood the complexity of the data challenges. Their strategic approach and technical expertise gave us confidence that they could transform our vision into reality.”
CEO · REAL ESTATE ANALYTICS PLATFORMIntake, court records, prior filings, correspondence and opposing production flow through connectors into an immutable raw store, a validated matter record, and an encoded-methodology layer — so every assertion in the generated document resolves back through the record to a page in the raw store. The firm's methodology becomes an asset that does not go home at 6pm.
The $2,000 deposit is credited toward the build and refundable for two weeks after the plan lands. The plan is yours either way.
Book a scoping call →